July 28, 2013
Power, power, power…
When President Obama recently visited Africa, he announced a “Power Africa” initiative. In his Cape Town University speech, he proclaimed, “I
am proud to announce a new initiative. We’ve been dealing with
agriculture. We’ve been dealing with health. Now we’re going to talk
about power: Power Africa, a new initiative that will double access to
power in sub-Saharan Africa. Double it. We’re going to start by
investing $7 billion in U.S. government resources. We’re going to
partner with the private sector, who themselves have committed more than
$9 billion in investment.”
In the speech, President Obama used
the word “power” 21 times in a variety of contexts. He philosophized
about “power that comes from acting on our ideals” and the “power of
human beings to affect change”. He urged Africans to act “through the
power of your example”. He encouraged support for programs “that empower
women”. He mildly chided “those in power who make arguments to distract
people from their own abuses.”
He puzzled over “what it will take
to empower individual Africans” and enable Africans to have the “power
to feed themselves.” He pleaded for “unleashing the power of
entrepreneurship and market” and the creation of “partnership that
empowers Africans.” He spoke about “the power to prevent illness and
care for the sick” and “the power to connect their people to the promise
of the 21st century.”
He lamented “Africa’s lack of access to
power” and the need “to have power.” He “talked about power — Power
Africa” and “doubling access to power in sub-Saharan Africa.” He pitied
those Africans who “live currently off the power grid.”
He
wistfully spoke about Nelson Mandela “leaving power” which “was as
profound as his ability to claim power”. He spoke of Mugabe’s
“corruption of power” and Zimbabwe’s economic collapse.
To power Africa or to empower Africans, that is the question
Africa
has a power problem. There is no question about that. Africa needs
protection from thugs-cum-leaders who abuse power, misuse power, confuse
power and excuse and justify their abuse and misuse of power. President
Obama is already powering Africa. Every year, he hands out billions of
dollars to Africa’s worst dictators (excuse me, he calls them
“partners”) who abuse power in countries like Ethiopia. Africa needs
people power not thugs in power.
On second thought, Africa does not have a power problem. Africa has a problem of powerlessness. The people are powerless against thugtators who use power to abuse their human rights.
Africans are powerless against the powerful forces of corruption –
officials and their cronies who “illicitly transfer” (steal and stash)
tens of billions of dollars in foreign banks. For instance, “Ethiopia
lost $11.7 billion to outflows of ill-gotten gains between 2000 and
2009” and “in 2009, illicit money leaving the country totaled $3.26
billion.” Africans are powerless and disempowered against powerful
election thieves who claim electoral victory by 99.6 percent. Africans
are powerless against powerful warlords who seek to divide them along
ethnic, religious, linguistic and regional lines. Yes, Africa’s
powerless have a big problem with Africa’s powerful thugtators.
President
Obama does not seem to get it. The question is not whether to power
Africa but how to protect powerless Africans from those dictators
America has powered and empowered by doling out billions of dollars in
aid, loans and technical assistance every year. If he wants to power
Africa, he should begin by empowering ordinary Africans against those
who abuse and misuse their power. He should power up the youth grid that
remains unused, abused and disused by those who manage the political
power grid. He should use the billions of dollars of annual aid to
disempower the few powerful African thugtators and empower the hundreds
of millions of African youth.
Last
week, in his New York Times opinion piece, Eskinder Nega, the symbol of
press freedom in Ethiopia and Africa, made a simple but effective
recommendation to President Obama: “I propose that the United States
impose economic sanctions on Ethiopia (while continuing to extend
humanitarian aid without precondition) and impose travel bans on
Ethiopian officials implicated in human rights violations.” This
proposal is in line with established U.S. policy. Beginning in 2001, the U.S. has imposed “targeted sanctions on the Government of Zimbabwe,
including restrictions on U.S. support for multilateral financing,
financial sanctions against selected individuals and entities, travel
sanctions against selected individuals, a ban on transfers of defense
items and services, and a suspension of non-humanitarian
government-to-government assistance.” The official reason for these
sanctions is the “Zimbawean Government’s increasing assault on human
rights and the rule of law.” The human rights record of the regime in
Ethiopia is far worse than the regime in Zimbabwe. That is a fact that
can be demonstrated. President Obama should understand that what’s good
for the goose is good for the gander.
If Obama wants to power Africa, let him empower African youth
President Obama has been talking about empowering African youth for years. In August 2010, he talked about launching “the Young African Leaders Initiative
(YALI) as a signature initiative that supports young African leaders as
they work to spur growth and prosperity, strengthen democratic
governance, and enhance peace and security across the continent.” In
June 2012, some “60 young African leaders” participated in “the
Innovation Summit and Mentoring Partnership with Young African Leaders”
for a “three-week professional development program”. To support the
“empowerment of young African leaders” and provide them “significant and
ongoing professional training, access to mentorship, and networking
opportunities in Africa”, USAID “awarded two grants totaling $1.3 million to support the core principles of Young African Leaders Initiative.”
In his Cape Town speech, President Obama told Africa’s young people:
“You get to decide where the future lies. Think about it — over 60
percent of Africans are under 35 years old. So demographics means young
people are going to be determining the fate of this continent and this
country. You’ve got time and numbers on your side, and you’ll be making
decisions long after politicians like me have left the scene.” But
Africa’s young people do not have the numbers on their side. They got
$1.3 million from America while Africa’s dictators get billions every
year.
In June 2013, President Obama talked about “launching a new program” called the “Washington Fellowship for Young African Leaders”
which is “going to give thousands of promising young Africans the
opportunity to come to the United States and develop skills at some of
our best colleges and universities.” A lot of nice talk and promises for
African young people; but promises and talk are more convincing when
one puts money where one’s mouth is. Since YALI, there has been more
talk than action.
But there is another side to the African youth
story. President Obama in Cape Town said, “And I’ve traveled to Africa
on this trip because my bet is on the young people who are the heartbeat
of Africa’s story. I’m betting on all of you.” Which segment of the
African youth is he betting on? The Washington Fellowship for Young
African Leaders promises to “give thousands of promising young Africans”
the “opportunity to come to the United States and develop their
skills.”
What about the millions of not-so-promising African
youths who waste away in the urban areas without educational and
employment opportunities? What about those African youths mired in rural
poverty unable to get even the most basic educational services? Those
young Africans who have acquired college education but are unable to
find employment because they are not connected to the ruling parties in
Africa? Those young Africans who are leaving the continent for menial
employment in the Middle East and elsewhere and are subjected to the
most inhumane conditions and treatment. Recently, BBC
reported the discovery of a grave in the desert of Yemen containing
some 400 bodies of young Ethiopian immigrants escaping the oppressive
conditions in Ethiopia. Do the not-so-promising youth matter to President Obama?
Along
the same lines, what does President Obama offer Africa’s young freedom
fighters? In 2009, in Accra, Ghana, he warned, “Now, make no mistake:
History is on the side of these brave Africans, not with those who use
coups or change constitutions to stay in power. Africa doesn’t need
strongmen, it needs strong institutions.”
Does President Obama
know of brave young Africans in prison named Eskinder Nega, Reeyot
Alemu, Woubshet Taye, Andualem Aragie, Olbana Lelisa, Bekele Gerba,
Abubekar Ahmed, Ahmedin Jebel and so many thousands of Ethiopian
political prisoners? President Obama needs to live up to the standards
he set for Africans and answer one question: Is he, like history, on the
side of brave Africans or is he on the side of Africa’s strongmen.
President Obama must choose between making brave young Africans strong
or African strongmen stronger.
Would $7 billion make a difference?
Lighting
the dark continent is a daunting task. Enlightening the benighted
“leaders” of the dark continent is an even more daunting fact. Over 130
years after the invention of the light bulb, the vast majority of
Africans remain in total darkness. It is a historical enigma that as
technology enlightens the world, Africa is enveloped in darkness. For
instance, Ethiopia got a functioning telephone system in 1894 and over
the past decade “invested some USD$14 billion in infrastructure
development” including communications. Yet today Ethiopia has the worst telecommunications system in Africa and quite possibly the world.
Power
outages and blackouts are common in every part of Africa. In June 2012,
as U.S. Secretary of State Hilary Clinton began her speech at the
African Union, she experienced firsthand what Africans face every day.
She had to stop her speech because of power outage.
Africa’s
electrical power problem is not merely low access and insufficient
capacity; it also involves poor reliability and extremely high costs.
The regime in Ethiopia windbags day and night about a pie-in-the-sky dam
on the Nile. They say it will be the largest dam in Africa and cost
USD$6-7 billion. This fantasy dam is supposed to resolve the power
supply problems of not only Ethiopia but also the region and beyond. The
fact of the matter is that the regime aims to export much of the power
produced from the dam and not use it for domestic power
self-sufficiency. It is also ironic that the regime seeks to convince
the population and the world that it can run the “largest dam” in Africa
when it cannot even manage efficiently the few dams that are currently
in existence. Yet the regime in Ethiopia keeps on windbagging the Nile
dam canard to create the grand illusion of development, hoodwink the
population and panhandle China and the international banks for more and
more handouts.
The World Bank says Africa needs USD$43 billion annually
to improve its power infrastructure. Would dropping USD$7 billion in
American tax dollars plus $9 billion from the private sector over five
years to “double” the power capacity make a difference in lighting
Africa or enlightening Africans? Throwing USD$3 billion a year to help
“Power Africa” for 5 years sounds like chicken feed. According to IMANI, the Ghanaian Center for Policy and Education,
“If all the electricity generated in Africa was shared equally, each
household would have enough to power a normal light-bulb for about 3.5
hours a day per person. With President Obama’s new initiative, this can
increase by roughly 18 more minutes if implementation was perfect.”
President
Obama cannot power Africa by empowering Africa’s strongmen. To power
Africa, he must first help empower Africa’s youth. He cannot empower
Africa’s youth with promises and silky words. He cannot power Africa by
empowering a few of Africa’s “best and brightest” by providing them
leadership training or skills. It is said that more than 600 million of
Africa’s one billion population is below the age of 25. The vast
majority of these youth are poor, undereducated and with little prospect
for lifetime economic viability. Vast numbers of these youths are
forced to work in whatever capacity to help their families survive while
losing educational opportunities that could free them from poverty. He
must come up with a different plan for Africa’s not-so-promising youth.
They are the majority of Africa!
The real answer to Africa’s
problems lies in creating a power grid among its youth. Any program that
is narrowly targeted to Africa’s talented youth will merely perpetuate
existing inequalities and keep the sons and daughters of the rich and
privileged at the top. The masses of youths at the bottom will not
accept this condition. Sooner or later, they will rise, power up and
disempower the strongmen who abuse their power. That’s how Africa will
be powered and empowered, President Obama!
No comments:
Post a Comment